com.joom.joom Security & Privacy Scorecard
iOS
Usage data and device activity may be shared with the app developer and any integrated services. Review the category summary below for details.
Best for
General use with standard privacy expectations
Findings
- 0 critical
- 0 high
- 3 medium
- 2 low
- 7 info
1 issue identified across security and privacy analysis.
Top security issues
- NSAllowsArbitraryLoads globally disables ATS, enabling MitM interception of in-app browser traffic that directly feeds the BrowserAppAPIController JS bridge attack chain
- BrowserAppAPIController injects a native JS bridge into all WebView origins, allowing attacker-injected scripts to trigger in-app navigation and Klarna checkout flows
- Log files protected with NSFileProtectionCompleteUntilFirstUserAuthentication allow forensic access while screen is locked on a payment app that may log session data
Top privacy issues
- Microsoft Clarity session replay captures input field values before masking with no elements masked by default, linked to authenticated user identity and transmitted to Microsoft's servers
- Installed app enumeration results (Facebook, VK, OK.ru, Klarna) transmitted to Joom servers and persisted server-side linked to advertising IDs — a tracking vector not requiring ATT consent
- PayPal PPRiskMagnes collects PreciseLocation linked to user identity; should be confirmed scoped to payment flows only rather than app launch
Full analysis
Joom
What This Means for You
Your browsing sessions, including text you type into forms before submitting, are recorded by a session replay tool and sent to Microsoft's servers, and the list of apps installed on your device is collected and linked to your advertising profile even when you decline ad tracking permission.
Recommendation: Use With Caution
A disabled HTTPS enforcement setting combined with a broadly exposed in-app browser bridge creates a path where a network attacker on the same Wi-Fi could trigger actions inside the app. Microsoft Clarity captures session activity including form input before masking takes effect. Use this app on trusted networks only.
Best For: Casual shoppers on trusted networks comfortable with behavioral analytics and multi-SDK tracking
Key Findings
Data Security - 1 finding (1 low)
Network Security - 4 findings (2 medium, 2 info)
Code Safety - 2 findings (2 info)
Privacy - 5 findings (1 medium, 1 low, 3 info)
Privacy Concerns
What Data is Collected
- Personal information: name, email address, account details
- Device information: device identifiers, advertising ID, list of installed apps
- Usage data: browsing behavior, session recordings including form input, click and scroll activity
- Location data: precise location (collected by the PayPal payment component during checkout)
Third-Party Data Sharing
The following third parties may receive your data:
- Microsoft Clarity - session replay including screen recordings and form input
- AppsFlyer - marketing attribution and analytics
- Adjust - marketing attribution with GDPR consent management
- PayPal (PPRiskMagnes) - device fingerprinting for payment fraud prevention
- Facebook - social login, sharing, and advertising measurement
- Klarna - payment processing and checkout analytics
- Google - sign-in and maps
- VKontakte - social login
- OK.ru (Odnoklassniki) - social login
- Yandex - maps
Understanding the Scores
Security: 89/100
Privacy: 87/100
Security Breakdown
- Data Security: 96/100 - Log files could use stronger protection on locked devices, but core data storage is handled responsibly.
- Network Security: 83/100 - HTTPS enforcement is globally disabled, reducing defense-in-depth, though the primary API uses secure connections.
- Code Safety: 100/100 - No unsafe code patterns identified in the app's core logic.
Privacy Breakdown
- Data Collection: 90/100 - Data collection is broad but mostly disclosed; Firebase Analytics is explicitly disabled.
- Data Sharing: 93/100 - Multiple attribution and analytics vendors receive data; dual attribution stack increases sharing surface.
- User Control: 91/100 - GDPR and ATT consent infrastructure is present, though installed-app enumeration bypasses ATT consent.
Positive Security Features
- Restricted certificate authority validation for core API connections using a curated CA bundle
- Firebase Analytics explicitly disabled, reducing behavioral data collection
- Facebook automatic event logging disabled
- Firebase App Check enabled to protect backend services from unauthorized access
- Adjust GDPR consent infrastructure with dedicated consent and withdrawal endpoints
- IAB Transparency and Consent Framework integrated
Areas for Improvement
GDPR / CCPA Compliance
The app's privacy practices could be strengthened by:
Enable Session Recording Masking
Microsoft Clarity is configured with no form fields masked, meaning typed input is captured before any masking can occur. Configuring field masking by default would reduce exposure of user-entered data.Scope Installed App Tracking
The list of apps installed on your device is collected and linked to advertising identifiers server-side. Limiting this to opt-in scenarios or removing the link to advertising IDs would better align with user expectations.
Security Enhancements
Re-enable HTTPS Enforcement
Globally disabling Apple's secure transport requirements removes a layer of protection for all connections. Restricting exceptions to only the specific domains that genuinely require them would restore defense-in-depth.Restrict In-App Browser Script Access
The bridge that connects in-app browser content to native app actions is currently available regardless of which website is loaded. Restricting access to known trusted origins would contain the risk from pages loaded over unprotected connections.
Technical Context
App Type: Social marketplace with integrated payment processing (high sensitivity)
Classes Analyzed: iOS binary analysis
Third-Party Services: 14 identified
Context Tags: shopping, ads, location, payments, social, analytics, session_replay
About This Analysis
This security analysis was conducted by CITT (Can I Trust That), an independent security analysis service. We perform static code analysis on iOS applications to help users make informed decisions about app security and privacy.
App Details
Developer: Joom
Version: 5.10.0 (Build 16426)
Analysis Date: 2026-04-17
Package: com.joom.joom
Analysis Limitations
- Static analysis only (code review without running the app)
- Based on IPA version 5.10.0 (Build 16426) analyzed on 2026-04-17
- May not reflect server-side security controls
- Cannot detect all runtime behaviors
Versions & scan history
| Scan | Date | Overall score |
|---|---|---|
| #2 (current) | 88/100 |