Skip to content

Can I trust Monthly Budget & Expense App?

unTRUSTED 74 Android Version 3.19.8 (versionCode 508; Play Store shows 3.19.9) Scanned build downloaded: Store version released: Last checked: com.amitm29.am.dailyexpensesmanager Scanned

This scan is more than 90 days old.

This app did not meet two or more trust checks, has a critical issue in one, or has a red flag.

What it means for you
The app includes code to send usage and crash data to Firebase Analytics and Crashlytics, and the Facebook SDK is present, whose code may send behavioral data to Meta. Financial data entered by the user is stored via Firebase cloud services. Permission access to device features beyond core tracking needs has been identified.
Main concern
Plaintext SQLite exposes all financial data; the Facebook SDK includes code to silently report purchases
The developer's description
Simplify your finances with a clean Monthly Expense Tracker. A secure Budget Planner and Money Manager designed to help you save more and spend less.
Third-party services
17
Findings rated low or higher
6

How the score and the label work

Open on Google PlayOpens the app's listing on Google Play in a new tab.

Full findings

Open this scan in your dashboard

The account that ran this scan sees every finding and the Rescan button there.

Trust checks

  • Secure by Design

    One criterion not met

    Security gaps detected

    Why this result

    This check looks for security issues at high severity or above in the code of this build, and at least one was recorded. Issues of this kind include a credential or token another app on the device can reach, sensitive data stored without protection, and network paths that expose information in transit.

  • Data Minimization

    An item rated high or above is open

    Tracking lacks clear disclosure

    Why this result

    This build contains analytics or attribution code written to send data to companies other than the developer. No consent step was found before that code runs, and the app's disclosures do not describe the collection in full. Tracking by itself is ordinary; what this check reports is the combination of collection, recipient and absent disclosure.

  • Manifest Mismatch

    An item rated high or above is open

    Disclosure incomplete or contradicted

    Why this result

    The check compares the app's privacy disclosures against what the code does, and at least one claim did not match in this build. Mismatches of this kind include a data category collected but not disclosed, a recipient the disclosure omits, and an identifier attached to data the disclosure describes as anonymous.

  • User Control

    Strong

    No lock-in

    Why this result

    The check looks for a way to export the data an account has accumulated and a way to delete the account itself. In this build, either both were found, or the app has no account of its own and keeps its data on the device. For an app without an account, the developer has no server-side copy to export or delete, and deleting the app removes the data in its own storage.

  • Truly Local

    One criterion not met

    Contains code to send personal data off the device

    Why this result

    This app presents itself as working offline or on the device alone, and this build contains code written to send personal data to servers. The check covers analytics, crash reporting, advertising code and any first-party endpoint the code addresses personal data to. Code of this kind is common; what this check reports is the distance between that code and how the app describes itself.

Red flags

  • The app's privacy declarations do not match its code

    Why this result

    The privacy declarations shipped in this build, or the ones on the store listing, state less than the code does. Declarations of this kind are what a store, a regulator and a person comparing two apps rely on.

  • Stores an identifier that survives a reinstall

    Why this result

    This build stores an identifier that survives deleting and reinstalling the app. An identifier of that kind links a new install back to the previous one, so removing the app does not end the profile built against it.

Strengths

  • All network traffic uses system-validated TLS with no cleartext HTTP exceptions
  • No custom TrustManager or SSL bypass implementations found
  • Biometric authentication implemented for app lock entry
  • WebView debugging disabled in Superwall paywall component

What the app contains

  • 17 services

    Third-party services the scan names in the build:

    • Firebase Analytics
    • Firebase Auth
    • Firebase Firestore
    • Firebase Realtime DB
    • Firebase Crashlytics
    • Firebase Remote Config
    • Firebase Messaging
    • Facebook SDK
    • RevenueCat
    • Amazon IAP
    • Superwall
    • Google Play Billing
    • Android AdServices (Privacy Sandbox)
    • OkHttp3
    • PdfiumCore
    • Google Play Integrity
    • Glance (AndroidX)

Libraries

Libraries in the build of Monthly Budget & Expense App
LibraryVersionAdvisory
Roomnot recordednone confirmed
Google Play Billingnot recordednone confirmed
Facebook SDKnot recordednone confirmed
Datatransportnot recordednone confirmed
Google Sign-In12451000none confirmed
Google Play Services12451000none confirmed
Material Componentsnot recordednone confirmed
Play Corenot recordednone confirmed
Play Integritynot recordednone confirmed
Gsonnot recordednone confirmed
Show all 16 libraries

Method and limits

Static analysis: the decompiled code, manifest and resources of this build, read file by file. Network traffic at run time is established by a capture of the running app.

Files decompiled
12,078
Scan date
13 June 2026

Corrections

No correction is published for this app.

Developer response

No response is published for this app.

Report an error Opens an email to [email protected] that names this app and this scan.